"Because get online 36 hours in the Internet bar continuously, sudden death of man Xu Mou is in the Internet bar. Law late reporter learns in the morning, first instance of the court that tell a state adjudicates the Internet bar assumes the responsibility of 10% .

Because get online 36 hours in the Internet bar continuously, sudden death of man Xu Mou is in the Internet bar. Law late reporter learns in the morning, first instance of the court that tell a state adjudicates the Internet bar assumes the responsibility of 10% . Laoxu and wife Qin Mou sue a court, the dead's Xu Mou is their son. Xu Mou opened state division in Beijing in March 2015 undertake online inside some Internet bar, die inside the Internet bar after. Laoxu's couple says, they did not receive the telephone call of the Internet bar when son sudden death, till morrow just receives police station announcement.

2 accuser think its child get online to all be to death inside this Internet bar, 2 accuser say this Internet bar is below the condition that did not approve legally through relevant section, open black Internet bar secretly inside the 1000 places of smooth rice, break the law below the case that does not have any Internet bars to offer a condition without according to manage, bring about its child Xu Mou dies. And the Internet bar violates 24 hours of business regulations, and the Internet bar should have tell the obligation with deliverance, so 2 accuser think the Internet bar ought to assume liability to pay compensation, the requirement adds up to compensatory RMB 1670438 yuan.

On the court the Internet bar expresses not to agree to undertake compensatory. Lose the child to 2 accuser they show regret and understanding. But of 2 accuser child Xu Mou is adult, should have control responsibility to his behavior. And say the Internet bar has the aptitude of lawful management Internet bar, and passed the safe examine and verify of management place of Beijing public security bureau. 2 accuser are in the circumstance that accuses the place in saying is narrated is many factual inconsistent with the facts, in its child 2 accuser drove the day of the accident to the spot, and was done in police station note, and say its are black Internet bar, caused abominable influence and huge pecuniary loss to the accused, retain interest of power to prosecute.

Classics court cognizance thinks after: The sudden death in the process that Xu Mou gets online in the Internet bar, via appraisal dead reason “ does not eliminate illness death ” . Xu Mou serves as person of competence of completely civil action to be as long as 36 hours uninterrupted get online, send its body excessive exhaustion, cause death finally. To the happening of dead consequence its oneself has fault, should assume corresponding civil responsibility. Although Internet bar all night does business not deregulation, but below the long case that Xu Mou gets online 36 hours continuously, extremelying He Yiren of Internet bar staff member gets online to Xu Mou time passes progress pedestrian sex to change remind, reason Internet bar also assumes corresponding liability to pay compensation to Xu Mou sudden death as management main body. Advocate to 2 accuser the Internet bar did not use up the opinion of deliverance obligation, the court thinks accident of Xu Mou sudden death is abrupt, in draw near the circumstance that discover for a short while and dials telephone of 120 emergency treatment in time already issues sitting Zhang Mou, internet bar staff member awaits personnel of 120 emergency treatment beside, show up call the police after rescue in emergency treatment personnel, the Internet bar had used up corresponding deliverance obligation to Xu Mou.