"Haidian district court sowed Wang Xin, Wu Ming, Zhang Kedong, Niu Wenju quickly to transmit bawdy article to seek profit with respect to Guangdong 2016 case make a court decision, court of the first intermediate people is opposite Beijing this morning this case undertakes 2 careful are adjudged publicly, reject the appeal of appellant Wu Ming, maintain original judgement.

On September 13, 2016, court of Beijing Haidian district sows limited company of science and technology and Wang Xin, Wu Ming, Zhang Kedong, Niu Wenju quickly to transmit bawdy article to seek profit with respect to city of Guangdong province Shenzhen case make a court decision, sow a company quickly to be sentenced fine 10 million yuan, CEO Wang Xin transmits bawdy article to gain profit the blame obtains punishment 3 years 6 months, fine 1 million yuan, the others tall canal also is sentenced and punish gold.

After first instance is adjudged, wu Ming of person of first trial the accused refuses to obey, put forward to appeal. This morning, court of the first intermediate people is opposite Beijing this case undertakes 2 careful are adjudged publicly, reject the appeal of appellant Wu Ming, maintain original judgement.

Forensic cognizance is found out, city of Shenzhen of unit of first trial the accused sows limited company of science and technology quickly to adopt network system medium many cache server intervenes bawdy video travels and refus nonperformance safety manages obligation, get a huge sum secondhand illegal profit.

Article of the glad of director staff king that sows a company quickly to be in charge of directly, Wu Ming, Zhang Kedong, ox is lifted, in know perfectly well the circumstance that sows company do sth without authorization quickly to be engaged in program of service of program of Internet seeing and hearing, offerred seeing and hearing containing the content such as pornography to fall, did not fulfil superintendency obligation, bawdy video is in indulge to sow the cache that the company is controlled and manages quickly to store inside the server and be downloaded, bring about a large number of bawdy video to travel on the net.

Forensic cognizance thinks, appellant Wu Ming and city of Shenzhen of unit of first trial the accused sow person of the accused of limited company of science and technology, first trial quickly Wang Xin, Zhang Kedong, Niu Wenju is a purpose with seeking profit, bawdy video transmits on Internet, its behavior already all made transmission bawdy article seeks profit blame, the clue is serious, should grant to penalize lawfully.

Wu Ming fastens appellant to sow career department general manager quickly, the sale that is in charge of sowing the core product such as the player quickly works, in sow career ministry quickly to have administrative power, ought to maintain be in charge of personnel for what be in charge of directly, the criminality agree that bawdy to sowing a company quickly to travel article seeks profit carries corresponding criminal responsibility.