- Author:admin
- Time:2016-12-17 19:59
Although the likelihood is well-meaning behavior, but still encroached a square rights and interests, in Japan strict copyright law falls, groups ” of group of caption of two China “ is small, because give,move overflow act of the character in matching, arrest.
According to Japan " read sell news " report, recently, member of ” of group of caption of two Chinese “ is travelled to move free work to be arrested in Kyoto with be suspected of illegal tort by Japanese police. They are the undergraduates of 30 years old that mix 20 years old in day company employee respectively.
Disclose according to local police, this year during 7-8 month, 2 people are right " battle writes down Yaersilan prostitution random dance " wait for series to move free match Chinese caption, broadcast the transmission after a few hours to arrive on the net in the TV station.
Suspect of 30 years old is the friend of king surname suspect of 20 years old, should Wang Suo asks a help he uploads a source. This case is the member that Japanese police first time arrests Chinese caption group. Chinese caricature pursues before the source also is to be thed capital of a country police is arrested, what arrest at that time is " 7 great pains " graph source, earlier before the Chinese graph cause that still one uploads source of graph of sea thief king to Euramerican website is arrested. The graph source fee that collects its according to every months of Euramerican website finds out bank account to lock up reseize of definitive edition person finally Japanese police, allegedly collect flower company and Japanese police are to tail stared at very long time.
Before this, japanese media has had a story to ” of group of Chinese “ caption, say they are in individual interest completely, translate work of foreign movie and TV freely, match act of the character in going up for its. This kind views the action that is like netizen of “ benefit ” , it is the behavior of a kind of tort actually.
As we have learned, this behavior violated the right of the 27th interpreter of Japanese copyright law, even if the penalty of well-meaning ineludible also law, additional, not the marrow that authorized interpreter cannot reflect original work possibly and intent.